Subscribe to the Newspaper
Publish your Stuff
Need Help? Click Here
Search: Site   Web
Print Story | E-Mail Story | Font Size
Tribune photo by Zach Spicer
Larry Dorsey, one of 54 protesters who sit in front of The Lion's Den adult bookstore in Uniontown, looks over the fence to record a customer's license plate.
What is this?

Save & Share this Article

Porn store sues over tower

Comments 0 | Recommend 0

BROWNSTOWN - Owners of a Uniontown adult bookstore claim the nuisances created by protesters on public property there have cost the company $300,000 in the past 180 days.

That claim is part of a lawsuit filed in Jackson Circuit Court on Monday. The lawsuit asks the court to order the county to remove "structures" and signs built on public property by protesters adjacent to The Lion's Den.

Commissioners attorney Stephen Pierson told commissioners during their meeting at the courthouse annex Tuesdaymorning he had received the lawsuit.

"The ball's in our court now," Pierson said.

That means the county can file any counterclaims it deems necessary, Pierson said.

According to the lawsuit, the structures and signs posted on public property by protesters at The Lion's Den violate county code because permits were not issued by the county plan commission office.

Several protesters attended the commissioners' meeting and questioned Pierson about the lawsuit, as well as lawsuits the county filed against The Lion's Den three days before and shortly after that business opened Aug. 19, 2005.

The older lawsuits were based upon county contentions the business violated ordinances governing the operations of sexually oriented businesses. One of those ordinances was enacted by commissioners shortly before the business opened. Later that year, a second ordinance was enacted.

The owners of The Lion's Den later filed a counterclaim against the county. No court ruling has been made on any of those lawsuits.

The newest lawsuit contends the protesters, part of Jackson County Watchdog, have erected, occupied and maintained various structures and improvements on county property without a permit, and that the defendants, who include commissioners, county Building Commissioner Mike Weir and the county plan commission, have not acted to prohibit the structures.

Pierson said the newest lawsuit indicates the store is losing money "left and right."

In the lawsuit, the owners of The Lion's Den are asking for damages in an amount to be determined by a trial because of civil rights violations, including the right to free speech and equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.

Pierson said the lawsuit will eventually be tried in court, but not as quickly as protesters would like.

"It will probably take a year or more," Pierson said.

Vernon Smith, one of the protesters, said they continue to maintain their vigil at the store, which began when it opened three years ago, without much help.

"We definitely need some help," Smith said. "We need our county officials."

Smith said protesters have a right to be at the store and also questioned why the original county lawsuits were not moving forward.

"Other counties are fighting this and winning big with ordinances just like Jackson County's," Smith said.

Smith said the only answer protesters have ever had from county officials was that the county did not need to be tied down by a long-running lawsuit.

"We have the rest of the taxpayers to look out for too," commissioners President Gary Darlage said.

In the new lawsuit, owners of The Lion's Den said they wrote letters in July and October 2006 bringing attention to the alleged zoning violations by protesters and the county has not acted to prohibit those structures.

Pierson said he has talked about the lawsuits with Scott Bergholdt, a Nashville, Tenn., attorney specializing in fighting sexually oriented businesses. Bergholdt is being paid by protesters.

"He's clearly thought about the case," Pierson said of Bergholdt.

"There's some ordinance work he and I feel like needs to be done."


See archived 'Top Stories' stories »
 


Reader Comments
From the editor: Many of you have expressed concerns about some of the harsh anonymous comments from readers. To remedy that, we are introducing new features. You can create your own blog, publish your news and share your photos with the community. Once you fill out a simple form and leave a verifiable e-mail address, you can set up your profile page. It will display all of your contributions and allow you to track issues and easily connect with others.

We want our site to be a place where people discuss and debate ideas that foster stronger communities. We built this for you. Please take care of it. Tolerate broad thinking, but take action against obscene or hateful material. Make it a credible and safe place worth preserving and sharing.


ADVERTISEMENT 
Publish Your Stuff
ADVERTISEMENT 
Poll
Stocks
Games
HEALTH CARE REFORM
Should the U.S. Senate vote on health care reform this session of Congress?
Yes -- Senators need to approve a comprehensive reform bill
Yes -- But it should not include a government option
No -- The nation can't afford it ritght now; it can wait
No -- Government should not expand its role in delivering health care
Enter The Code To Vote
 
Read Related Article
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site