Subscribe to the Newspaper
Publish your Stuff
Need Help? Click Here
Search: Site   Web
Print Story | E-Mail Story | Font Size
What is this?

Save & Share this Article

Court rejects Bassett appeal on conspiracy conviction

Comments 0 | Recommend 0

The Indiana Supreme Court declined to hear the appeal for a man convicted of conspiring to kill a deputy prosecutor while he was serving life in prison for the 1998 slayings of a Seymour woman and three children.

The decision exhausts Robert Bassett Jr.'s direct appeals options and leaves his 80-year sentence intact. Bassett had asked the high court to hear his case after the state Court of Appeals affirmed his sentence in April.

He was convicted of plotting to kill Kathleen Burns, who was the lead prosecutor on his quadruple murder case.

A Bartholomew Superior Court judge had sentenced Bassett in May 2007 to the maximum 50 years for the conspiracy count and added 30 years for being a habitual offender.

At the time, Bassett was already serving four life prison sentences without possibility of parole in the killings of Seymour resident Jamie Engleking, 20; her two children, Jessica Brown, 2, and Brandon Engleking, 1; and 12-year-old family friend Amanda Davis.

Bassett was convicted of those killings in May 2006 in Dearborn County. An earlier conviction was overturned.
 
Bassett's appeal said that evidence of the quadruple homicide was unfairly prejudicial, hearsay testimony was allowed during the trial, insufficient evidence was provided and his attorney was ineffective.

According to the order June 19, the Supreme Court justices had reviewed the Court of Appeals decision and declined to hear the case.
 
The victims of the quadruple murder were last seen alive on Aug. 15, 1998, during a camping trip in southern Bartholomew County. Their remains were found about a month later in shallow graves along the East Fork of the White River.


See archived 'News and Photos' stories »
 


Reader Comments
From the editor: Many of you have expressed concerns about some of the harsh anonymous comments from readers. To remedy that, we are introducing new features. You can create your own blog, publish your news and share your photos with the community. Once you fill out a simple form and leave a verifiable e-mail address, you can set up your profile page. It will display all of your contributions and allow you to track issues and easily connect with others.

We want our site to be a place where people discuss and debate ideas that foster stronger communities. We built this for you. Please take care of it. Tolerate broad thinking, but take action against obscene or hateful material. Make it a credible and safe place worth preserving and sharing.


ADVERTISEMENT 
Publish Your Stuff
ADVERTISEMENT 
Poll
Stocks
Games
Medora Covered Bridge
Are you supportive of plans to rehabilitate the Medora Covered Bridge?
Yes. It's a unique historic structure that should be preserved.
No. Federal stimulus money is taxpayers' money and shouldn't be spent on a dilapidated bridge that's outlived its usefulness.
Yes. If the money isn't used for this, the funds will just go to a project outside the county.
No. Maybe the money will be used somewhere else on real infrastructure needs.
Enter The Code To Vote
 
Read Related Article
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site